Maybe you've seen the movie
Nostalghia by Andrei Tarkovsky, but I'm guessing you probably haven't. I wouldn't have heard of it myself except that BYU had an excellent International Cinema program and I had an excellent friend who was into Tarkovsky films. Lacking a girlfriend and being something of an introverted film geek, I attended International Cinema fairly religiously my freshman year--it gave me something to do, required no significant human interaction, and was free. I guess what I'm getting at is that my friend didn't exactly have to drag me into the theater.
About halfway through, I think I fell asleep--I don't really remember.
Nostalghia is slow. Painfully slow. My eighteen-year-old brain just couldn't deal with the long, static shots that seemed to last for ten minutes at a stretch. Great swathes of time passed in which absolutely nothing happens. Nearly everything about the melancholy protagonist seemed to move in extreme slow motion. And that, of course, was the point.
Nostalghia is about a Russian poet on an extended research trip in rural Italy. The splendors of Italy lie around him--lush, hazy meadows, medieval paintings, and a traveling companion who looks like she might have been painted by Botticelli, but the poet is stuck in neutral. He seems paralyzed by remembered images of of his wife and homeland, both of them perpetually present if only in his mind.
Tarkovsky put more than a little of himself in the homesick poet. It wasn't many years later that he made the decision to defect from the Soviet Union, taking his wife but leaving his son behind the Iron Curtain. When asked by reporters whether he planned to settle in Italy, Tarkovsky was clear on the emotional cost of putting himself into permanent exile. The question of where he would relocate was irrelevant, he said, because the damage was already done. It was like asking him where he wanted to bury his children.
I've been thinking about
Nostalghia recently because of my own longing for Virginia, and it makes me wonder: Is there anyway to cherish past happiness without souring, at least a little, the enjoyment of your present condition? Or is it the other way around: do we sustain and even embellish our memories of the glorious past as a way of compensating for our present discontents? "I'm unhappy now, but only because I've lost XYZ."
I commented a couple weeks ago on how much I loved living in Charlottesville, and how I miss it now that I live Elsewhere. What I wonder is, would I be fonder of where I am now if it didn't come on the heels of a place as personally idyllic as central Virginia? I'm still living in the same basic region of the country, still living under the same sky, but the trees seem scragglier, the terrain is less pristine, and the air doesn't seem as blue. More clinically, I also know that Elsewhere has more than its share of industrial pollution in the water, and I wonder if this knowledge doesn't cause me to regard even scenes of nature with a jaundiced eye. As I've told a few friends, Elsewhere is like everywhere else, only less so. It's not disappointing, but it's underwhelming.
Don't get me wrong. Elsewhere is still a great place to practice law and the decision to move here was a rational one, but it was one of those responsible, grown-up decisions that favors prudence and stability over sparkle and whimsy. Sometimes K and I ask ourselves whether we can visualize living here into our middle age, and we honestly can't say. It's not a place that will burn you out, but neither is it a conucopia of endless diversions. Maybe what I'm really rebelling against is not the place itself, but that my choosing to live here represents the end of my carefree student days. Charlottesville was a great place to learn; Elsewhere is a great place to work. You tell me which sounds sunnier.